Every engagement ends with running software, its source, and the documentation to operate it. This is the shape that work takes.
Not a description of effort. A list of the artefacts that exist in your account at the end.
Turn repetitive operational work into monitored pipelines.
Ship one product into every market without a release train per locale.
Machine translation you can put in front of customers.
A test suite your team actually trusts.
Model-backed features built like the rest of your product.
Internal tools for the workflow your team actually has.
The demo is one box in the middle. Everything around it is what decides whether the system is still running in a year.
One box here is the model. The rest is what decides whether the thing survives contact with a Tuesday: where work arrives from, what happens when the score is low, and where the result lands. Each stage is described below.
Documents, API events and queue messages arrive in whatever format the upstream system produces. Nothing upstream has to change.
Models pull structured fields out of unstructured input and validate them against a schema before anything downstream sees them.
Every record carries a score. Above threshold it continues; below it, it queues for a person with the context already assembled.
A purpose-built queue where the reviewer's decision is one keystroke, and each correction becomes training signal.
Results land in your systems of record through documented, versioned connectors with retries and idempotency.
Run history, failure alerting, cost and latency per stage. Inspectable months later when someone asks what happened.
All three end the same way: source, deployment and documentation in your hands.
Fixed scope, fixed price
We agree the scope and definition of done up front, then deliver against it. Best when you know what you need and want a predictable number.
Best for: A defined outcome with a deadline
Monthly, capped hours
A set number of senior engineering hours each month, prioritised by you. Best once something is live and needs to keep evolving.
Best for: Ongoing work with shifting priorities
Per engineer, monthly
Our engineers work inside your process: your repo, your standups, your review. Best when you have capacity gaps rather than a discrete project.
Best for: Extending an in-house team
Most of what we build sits inside someone else's product or back office, under NDA. Rather than post anonymised stories you can't verify, we'll walk you through comparable work on a call and put you in touch with a reference where the client has agreed to it.
The most useful first message describes what someone on your team does by hand today and how often. That is enough for us to tell you whether it is worth building.
