Continuous string extraction
New and changed strings are detected on merge, with the surrounding UI context attached for whoever translates them.
Ship one product into every market without a release train per locale.
A string added on Tuesday reaches a translator on Friday and the release two sprints later, by which time the copy has changed again. Teams end up shipping late everywhere, or early in one language only.
Abdul Rehman
AI Engineer · leads this service
We wire string extraction, translation and reintegration into the same pipeline that builds your product, so a new locale becomes a build condition rather than a separate project with its own timeline.
Scoped per engagement. We start with whichever of these removes the biggest constraint first.
New and changed strings are detected on merge, with the surrounding UI context attached for whoever translates them.
German runs long, Arabic runs right-to-left, Japanese breaks differently. We verify rendering per locale, not just the string table.
Memory and approved terminology live in version control beside the product and are reviewed the same way.
Hold the build, ship partial, or ship with fallbacks: an explicit decision instead of an accident discovered in production.
ICU MessageFormat, JSON, XLIFF, gettext, iOS and Android resources, and CMS-driven content.
Your existing LSP, an MT engine, or an internal reviewer. Routing is a configuration choice, not a rebuild.
Typical shape for this service. Timings move with scope, the order does not.
Week 1
We follow one string from the moment it is written to the moment a user in another market reads it, and record every hand-off it survives.
Week 1–2
We design extraction, routing and write-back around your repo, file formats and release cadence.
Week 2–6
The pipeline runs alongside your current process until locale completeness stops being checked by hand.
Ongoing
Source, runbook and the failure modes we hit, so your team can operate it without us.
Chosen per engagement and biased toward what your team can maintain after we leave.
No. We integrate with your existing vendor. The pipeline decides what gets routed where; it does not care who does the translating.
RTL is treated as a layout concern as much as a text one: mirrored components, bidirectional text handling, and per-locale visual QA before release.
We extract them as the first phase. That audit is usually the most valuable part of the early work.
The most useful first message describes what someone on your team does by hand today and how often. That is enough for us to tell you whether it is worth building.