Review and annotation surfaces
Interfaces built for the work of judging, labelling and correcting, designed around throughput rather than screenshots.
Service
AITools
Internal tools for the workflow your team actually has.
Running
- Internal tools
- Ops consoles
- Annotation UI
- Enterprise search
Theproblem
The process is running ona spreadsheet
Every team has one workflow held together by a shared sheet, three browser tabs and a person who knows the order to do things in. It works until that person is on leave.
Haider
UI/UX Designer · leads this service
Our approach
Review queues, annotation surfaces, operations consoles and model-assisted internal search, scoped to one workflow, built to be boring, and handed over with the source so it never becomes a dependency on us.
What youget
- Working tool scoped to a single workflow
- SSO, roles and audit logging
- Deployment in your environment
- Repository, docs and a support window
- Scope
- One workflow
- Ownership
- Yours
- Spreadsheet
- Retired
Capabilities
What AI Toolsincludes
Scoped per engagement. We start with whichever of these removes the biggest constraint first.
Operations consoles
One place to see what ran, what failed and what needs a decision, instead of four dashboards and a log tail.
Model-assisted internal search
Retrieval across the contracts, tickets and documents your team already has and currently cannot find.
Role-based access
SSO, permissions and audit logging, because internal tools reach real data and usually outlive their original scope.
Reporting and export
The numbers your team is asked for each month, generated rather than assembled by hand.
Handover by default
Source, deployment and documentation are yours. We are a supplier, not a single point of failure.
Delivery
Howa project runs
Typical shape for this service. Timings move with scope, the order does not.
- 01
Shadow
Week 1
We watch the workflow run for a full cycle and note where time and errors actually accumulate.
- 02
Scope hard
Week 1
One workflow, one tool. The second workflow is a second conversation, not scope creep.
- 03
Build with users
Week 2–6
We ship early to the people who will use it and change it based on use rather than feedback rounds.
- 04
Hand over
Ongoing
Repository, deployment and docs transferred, with a support window while your team takes it on.
Typicalstack
Tools we reach for
Chosen per engagement and biased toward what your team can maintain after we leave.
- Next.js
- TypeScript
- Python
- PostgreSQL
- LLM APIs
- Docker
Commonquestions
The questions we getabout Custom Tools
Why not buy an off-the-shelf product?
If one fits, buy it. We will say so. We build when the process is specific to how your company works, which is usually why it has value.
Who owns the code?
You do, from the first commit. Work happens in your repository wherever possible.
What does support look like after handover?
A defined window of bug fixes and questions, then an optional retainer. Neither is a condition of getting the source.
Starthere
Tell us the process,not the solution.
The most useful first message describes what someone on your team does by hand today and how often. That is enough for us to tell you whether it is worth building.
What happens next
- A named engineer reads it, not a form inbox
- Reply within 24 hours, even if we're not the right fit
- A 30-minute call to trace the process end to end
- A fixed-scope quote, or an honest no